The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Beam 1.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 34.8. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Reflection AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 34.8, ranking #46 overall.

In the 11 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 10; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 10 of 11 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Beam 1.0
Reflection AI
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.6
#46
34.8
#110
Reasoning
45.5
#37
36.0
#94
Coding
33.7
#39
20.9
#110
Agents
28.8
#53
16.4
#101
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
10 of 11
1 of 11
Input price
$0.40 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Beam 1.0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Math
35.1#45
27.8#105
Vision
15.9#105
20.3#86
Tool use
26.4#32
10.9#134
Long context
29.5#5
22.2#21
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

11 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 10 benchmarks (AA-LCR, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, SciCode, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau3 Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 1 benchmark (BrowseComp).

Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Beam 1.0 is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerTogether
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

381.3B diff

Beam 1.0 has 381.3B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B), making it 317.8% larger.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
501.3Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
120.0Bparameters
501.3B
Beam 1.0
120.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Beam 1.0 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Beam 1.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.

Beam 1.0 is 0 month newer than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

4 days ago

1d newer
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

5 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date.

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

—

Provider Availability

Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Beam 1.0

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
reflection logo
Unknown Organization

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 34.8. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

Is Beam 1.0 cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Beam 1.0 costs $0.40/M input and $1.20/M output via together. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 34.8), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons