The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Beam 1.0 vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 14.5.

Reflection AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 14.5, ranking #46 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.6
#46
14.5
#257
45.5
#37
14.9
#251
33.7
#39
5.5
#218
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Beam 1.0
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
35.1#45
18.2#194
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

2 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 0 benchmarks.

Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

487.3B diff

Beam 1.0 has 487.3B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 3480.7% larger.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
501.3Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
501.3B
Beam 1.0
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Beam 1.0 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Beam 1.0 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

Beam 1.0 is 18 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.

Beam 1.0 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus (2025-03-01).

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

1.3 yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 14.5. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 14.5), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.