Beam 1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 20.6. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Reflection AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 20.6, ranking #46 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Beam 1.0

Reflection AI

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

44.6

#46 · 22 evals

Best

20.6

#215 · 9 evals

Reasoning

45.5

#37 · 19 evals

Best

20.7

#207 · 8 evals

Coding

33.7

#39 · 9 evals

Best

11.9

#172 · 5 evals

Agents

28.8

#53 · 9 evals

Best

5.2

#168 · 3 evals

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

2 of 2

Best

0 of 2

Input price

$0.40 / M

$0.30 / M

Best

Output price

$1.20 / M

$1.00 / M

Best

Context window

1,048,576

Best

262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared

Index

Beam 1.0

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Tool use

26.4#32 · 4 evals

12.3#122 · 4 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 10 for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

2 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Beam 1.0 is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Beam 1.0

Input tokens$0.40

Output tokens$1.20

Best providerTogether

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$1.00

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

21.3B diff

Beam 1.0 has 21.3B more parameters than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct, making it 4.4% larger.

Beam 1.0

501.3Bparameters

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

480.0Bparameters

501.3B

Beam 1.0

480.0B

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Beam 1.0 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Beam 1.0

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

Beam 1.0 is 21 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.7yr newer

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date.

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

Beam 1.0

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Unknown Organization

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0

✓ Preferred

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 20.6. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

Is Beam 1.0 cheaper than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Beam 1.0 costs $0.40/M input and $1.20/M output via together. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 20.6), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.30/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Beam 1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct