ChatGPT-4o Latest vs MiMo-V2-Flash
ChatGPT-4o Latest and MiMo-V2-Flash are closely matched at 24.9 and 30.7 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2-Flash is 29.2x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
ChatGPT-4o Latest and MiMo-V2-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.9 and 30.7.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ChatGPT-4o Latest wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 29.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2-Flash also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ChatGPT-4o Latest
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
Choose MiMo-V2-Flash
- cost matters — it's about 29.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
1 reported for ChatGPT-4o Latest · 15 for MiMo-V2-Flash
ChatGPT-4o Latest outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.
ChatGPT-4o Latest significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ChatGPT-4o Latest ($2.50/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, ChatGPT-4o Latest ($10.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, ChatGPT-4o Latest is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to ChatGPT-4o Latest's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 16,384 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
ChatGPT-4o Latest supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.
ChatGPT-4o Latest can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
ChatGPT-4o Latest
MiMo-V2-Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
ChatGPT-4o Latest is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ChatGPT-4o Latest was released on 2024-05-13, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 19 months newer than ChatGPT-4o Latest.
May 13, 2024
2.4 years ago
Dec 16, 2025
9 months ago
1.6yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
ChatGPT-4o Latest is available from OpenAI. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.
ChatGPT-4o Latest
MiMo-V2-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ChatGPT-4o Latest and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ChatGPT-4o Latest vs MiMo-V2-Flash.