Model Comparison

ChatGPT-4o Latest vs MiMo-V2-Flash

ChatGPT-4o Latest significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 29.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

ChatGPT-4o Latest outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

ChatGPT-4o Latest significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, ChatGPT-4o Latest ($2.50/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, ChatGPT-4o Latest ($10.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ChatGPT-4o Latest is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
ChatGPT-4o Latest
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to ChatGPT-4o Latest's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
ChatGPT-4o Latest
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sun Apr 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

ChatGPT-4o Latest supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

ChatGPT-4o Latest can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ChatGPT-4o Latest

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ChatGPT-4o Latest is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ChatGPT-4o Latest

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ChatGPT-4o Latest was released on 2024-05-13, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 19 months newer than ChatGPT-4o Latest.

ChatGPT-4o Latest

May 13, 2024

2.0 years ago

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

4 months ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ChatGPT-4o Latest is available from OpenAI. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

ChatGPT-4o Latest

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (84.0% vs 83.7%)
Xiaomi
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
ChatGPT-4o Latest
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about ChatGPT-4o Latest vs MiMo-V2-Flash

ChatGPT-4o Latest significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ChatGPT-4o Latest is made by OpenAI and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ChatGPT-4o Latest scores GPQA: 84.0%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. ChatGPT-4o Latest costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.
ChatGPT-4o Latest supports 128K tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 256K), input pricing ($2.50 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ChatGPT-4o Latest is developed by OpenAI and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.