Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 1.5 Pro Comparison

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 1.5 Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 2 benchmarks (DROP, HumanEval), while Gemini 1.5 Pro is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MGSM, MMLU-Pro).

Gemini 1.5 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 3.1x cheaper than Gemini 1.5 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Gemini 1.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Pro is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2,097,152 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input2,097,152 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Gemini 1.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 1.5 Pro was released on 2024-05-01.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 6 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Pro.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

5mo newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro

May 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Pro's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Nov 2023

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Gemini 1.5 Pro is available from Google. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Gemini 1.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher DROP score (83.1% vs 74.9%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.1% vs 84.1%)
Larger context window (2,097,152 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (59.1% vs 41.6%)
Higher MATH score (86.5% vs 69.4%)
Higher MGSM score (87.5% vs 85.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (75.8% vs 65.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro