The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-6 Cyber

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 4.5. Claude 3.5 Haiku is 25.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 4.5, ranking #77 overall.

On price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is roughly 25.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • cost matters — it's about 25.0x cheaper per token

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.0 and ranks #77 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
4.5
#341
41.0
#77
Coding
3.6
#251
33.5
#49
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.80 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
$100.00 / M
Context window
200,000
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 1 for GPT-6 Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 25.0x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Cyber supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

GPT-6 Cyber can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05.

GPT-6 Cyber is 25 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

2.0 years ago

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

3 days ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-6 Cyber.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-6 Cyber?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 4.5. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to GPT-6 Cyber in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (4.5 vs 41.0), context window (200K vs 1.1M), input pricing ($0.80 vs $20.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-6 Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons