The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 5.4.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 5.4, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.4
#286
42.5
#45
4.4
#202
35.6
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 23 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 5.4. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.4 vs 42.5). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.