The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched at 39.2 and 48.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 39.2 and 48.5.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
39.2
#74
48.5
#29
Coding
31.7
#52
37.8
#23
Agents
28.5
#54
35.6
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 14 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

1 shared

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CyberGym), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 months ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 39.2 and 48.5. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (39.2 vs 48.5), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons