The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 4.6.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 4.6, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.0 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
4.6
#335
59.0
#2
Reasoning
4.8
#329
54.9
#5
Coding
3.8
#244
48.1
#3
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 4 Carbon
Tool use
-4.8#223
35.8#3
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 16 for Gemini 4 Carbon

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Carbondon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Carbon supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Gemini 4 Carbon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 25 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

-3 days ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Carbon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Gemini 4 Carbon
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 4 Carbon.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 4.6. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemini 4 Carbon in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemini 4 Carbon supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (4.6 vs 59.0), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google.

Related comparisons