Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Particle-1
Particle-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.9 to 4.6. Particle-1 is 3.7x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Particle AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Particle-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.9 to 4.6, ranking #133 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Particle-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Particle-1 is roughly 3.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Particle-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
- you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output
Choose Particle-1
- overall performance matters — it scores 31.9 and ranks #133 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 3.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 3 for Particle-1
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Particle-1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Particle-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 3.2x more expensive than Particle-1 ($0.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Particle-1 ($1.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Particle-1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Particle-1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Particle-1 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Particle-1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.
Particle-1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Particle-1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Particle-1 was released on 2026-10-28.
Particle-1 is 25 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Oct 22, 2024
2.0 years ago
Oct 28, 2026
1 days ago
2.0yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Particle-1 is available from Particle AI.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Particle-1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Particle-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Particle-1.