The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok 4.6

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok 4.6 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok 4.6 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok 4.6 also accepts a larger context window (500,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token

Choose Grok 4.6

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 500,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Grok 4.6
xAI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.80 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
200,000
500,000
Released
Oct 2024
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok 4.6don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Grok 4.6 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Grok 4.6 ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.6 is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
xAI
Grok 4.6
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok 4.6 accepts 500,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
xAI
Grok 4.6
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Grok 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Grok 4.6 was released on 2026-08-12.

Grok 4.6 is 22 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.8 years ago

Grok 4.6

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.8yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.6 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.6's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Grok 4.6

Feb 2026

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Grok 4.6 is available from xAI.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Grok 4.6

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok 4.6 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.6
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok 4.6.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Grok 4.6?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Grok 4.6 in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Grok 4.6 scores CursorBench v3.2: 69.9%, DeepSWE 1.1: 65.9%, FrontierCode: 61.3%, AA-Index: 61.0%, GDPval-AA: 58.4%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Grok 4.6?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Grok 4.6 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok 4.6?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Grok 4.6 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok 4.6?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 500K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok 4.6?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons