The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Sarvam-105B

Sarvam-105B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 19.1.

Anthropic · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Sarvam-105B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 19.1, ranking #152 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Sarvam-105B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 25.7 and ranks #152 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.1
#206
25.7
#152
20.1
#188
26.2
#147
11.4
#154
-1.6
#247
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Sarvam-105B
23.2#132
29.1#88
23.3#69
26.4#45
23.3#57
26.4#34
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 14 for Sarvam-105B

4 shared

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Sarvam-105B is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Sarvam-105B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-105B is 17 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Sarvam-105B?

Sarvam-105B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 19.1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Sarvam-105B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.1 vs 25.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Sarvam-105B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.