The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark Open vs Sarvam-105B

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 25.4.

Meta · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 25.4, ranking #43 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you are already invested in the Sarvam AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.9
#43
25.4
#179
45.2
#39
25.9
#172
33.0
#42
-2.0
#271
30.6
#43
5.3
#168
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Muse Spark Open
Sarvam-105B
31.6#69
29.0#94
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Muse Spark Open · 14 for Sarvam-105B

1 shared

Muse Spark Open outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Sarvam-105B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

711.0B diff

Muse Spark Open has 711.0B more parameters than Sarvam-105B, making it 677.1% larger.

Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
816.0B
Muse Spark Open
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark Open specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark Open specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark Open supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Muse Spark Open can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark Open is licensed under Muse Model License, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Muse Spark Open is 7 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

7mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark Open and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark Open
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark Open vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Muse Spark Open or Sarvam-105B?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 25.4. Muse Spark Open is made by Meta and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark Open compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark Open and Sarvam-105B?

Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark Open and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.9 vs 25.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Muse Model License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark Open and Sarvam-105B?

Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.