Claude 3 Haiku vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -1.2.
Anthropic · IBM · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -1.2, ranking #156 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3 Haiku
- you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output
Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B
- overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.
Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3 Haiku
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.
IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 30 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.
Mar 13, 2024
2.5 years ago
Aug 25, 2026
5 days ago
2.5yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.