The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 24.0.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 24.0, ranking #16 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Flash wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
49.6
#16
21.8
#165
49.2
#16
9.6
#159
36.6
#20
7.9
#124
35.5
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen3.8 Flash
25.6#103
32.6#55
10.6#116
31.6#10
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

5 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Flash is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro).

Qwen3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

95.0B diff

Qwen3.8 Flash has 95.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 316.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
125.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
125.0B
Qwen3.8 Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Qwen3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8 Flash is 0 month newer than IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

4 days ago

1d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 24.0. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 49.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.