The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 24.0.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 24.0, ranking #15 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.7 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
49.7
#15
21.8
#165
49.3
#15
9.6
#159
36.6
#18
7.9
#124
35.5
#13
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
25.6#103
32.7#54
10.6#116
31.6#9
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

5 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

95.0B diff

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 95.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 316.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 0 month newer than IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

4 days ago

1d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 24.0. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 49.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.