The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Haiku vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -1.5. Claude 3 Haiku is 16.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -1.5, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Claude 3 Haiku is roughly 16.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku

  • cost matters — it's about 16.0x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-1.5
#351
47.9
#29
Reasoning
-1.5
#344
33.1
#108
Coding
0.6
#253
38.9
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
200,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3 Haiku and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 16.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 16.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3 Haiku and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 31 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.6 years ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 days ago

2.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -1.5. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than Muse Wonder?

Claude 3 Haiku is 16.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and Muse Wonder?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.5 vs 47.9), context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.25 vs $4.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and Muse Wonder?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons