Claude 3 Opus vs Codestral-22B
Comparing Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic and Codestral-22B by Mistral AI across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while Codestral-22B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Codestral-22B does not.
Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3 Opus
Codestral-22B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Codestral-22B uses MNPL-0.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MNPL-0.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29.
Codestral-22B is 3 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.
Feb 29, 2024
2.1 years ago
May 29, 2024
1.8 years ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Opus
View detailsAnthropic
Codestral-22B
View detailsMistral AI
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|