Claude 3 Opus vs LongCat-2.5
LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 9.4. LongCat-2.5 is 57.1x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Meituan · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 9.4, ranking #20 overall.
On price, LongCat-2.5 is roughly 57.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
LongCat-2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3 Opus
- you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output
Choose LongCat-2.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 57.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Claude 3 Opus · 23 for LongCat-2.5
Claude 3 Opus and LongCat-2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens) is 62.5x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than LongCat-2.5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
LongCat-2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3 Opus can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while LongCat-2.5 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude 3 Opus and LongCat-2.5 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3 Opus
LongCat-2.5
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.
LongCat-2.5 is 33 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.
Feb 29, 2024
2.7 years ago
Nov 1, 2026
-1 days ago
2.7yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.
Claude 3 Opus
LongCat-2.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs LongCat-2.5.