The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LongCat-2.5 vs Particle-1

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 32.0. Particle-1 is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Meituan · Particle AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 32.0, ranking #20 overall.

On price, Particle-1 is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LongCat-2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Particle-1

  • cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
50.0
#20
32.0
#135
48.3
#21
31.2
#137
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.25 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for LongCat-2.5 · 3 for Particle-1

No common benchmarks found

LongCat-2.5 and Particle-1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Particle-1 costs less

For input processing, LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Particle-1 ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Particle-1 ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, LongCat-2.5 is more expensive than Particle-1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Particle AI
Particle-1
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Particle AI
Particle-1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LongCat-2.5 and Particle-1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LongCat-2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Particle-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01, while Particle-1 was released on 2026-10-28.

LongCat-2.5 is 0 month newer than Particle-1.

LongCat-2.5

Nov 1, 2026

-1 days ago

4d newer
Particle-1

Oct 28, 2026

3 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan. Particle-1 is available from Particle AI.

LongCat-2.5

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Particle-1

particle-ai logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-2.5 and Particle-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-2.5
✓ Preferred
Particle-1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-2.5 vs Particle-1.

Which is better, LongCat-2.5 or Particle-1?

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 32.0. LongCat-2.5 is made by Meituan and Particle-1 is made by Particle AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LongCat-2.5 compare to Particle-1 in benchmarks?

LongCat-2.5 scores MathVision: 96.5%, BrowseComp: 91.9%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.4%, Video-MME: 85.2%. Particle-1 scores GPQA: 90.4%, BabyVision: 89.2%, MMLU: 86.1%.

Is LongCat-2.5 cheaper than Particle-1?

Particle-1 is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. LongCat-2.5 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan. Particle-1 costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via particle-ai.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-2.5 and Particle-1?

LongCat-2.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Particle-1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-2.5 and Particle-1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 32.0), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.25/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-2.5 and Particle-1?

LongCat-2.5 is developed by Meituan and Particle-1 is developed by Particle AI.