Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 56.3 to 30.4. GLM-5V-Turbo is 10.5x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 56.3 to 30.4, ranking #2 overall.
On price, GLM-5V-Turbo is roughly 10.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Fable 5.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Fable 5.1
- overall performance matters — it scores 56.3 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose GLM-5V-Turbo
- cost matters — it's about 10.5x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 19 for GLM-5V-Turbo
Claude Fable 5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than GLM-5V-Turbo ($1.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than GLM-5V-Turbo ($4.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Fable 5.1 is more expensive than GLM-5V-Turbo.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Fable 5.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5V-Turbo's 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Fable 5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Fable 5.1
GLM-5V-Turbo
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02.
Claude Fable 5.1 is 5 months newer than GLM-5V-Turbo.
Sep 1, 2026
1 weeks ago
5mo newerApr 2, 2026
5 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Fable 5.1 is available from Anthropic. GLM-5V-Turbo is available from ZAI.
Claude Fable 5.1
GLM-5V-Turbo
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo.