The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Magistral Medium

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 13.1.

Anthropic · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 13.1, ranking #2 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5.1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.7 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Magistral Medium

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
55.7
#2
13.1
#247
52.8
#5
13.3
#238
35.5
#27
3.5
#216
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 6 for Magistral Medium

1 shared

Claude Fable 5.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Magistral Medium is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Fable 5.1 and Magistral Medium support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Fable 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Magistral Medium uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Fable 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10.

Claude Fable 5.1 is 15 months newer than Magistral Medium.

Claude Fable 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.2yr newer
Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Claude Fable 5.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Fable 5.1's cutoff date.

Claude Fable 5.1

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and Magistral Medium side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.1
✓ Preferred
Magistral Medium
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs Magistral Medium.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Magistral Medium?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 13.1. Claude Fable 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5.1 compare to Magistral Medium in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores OSWorld 2.0: 77.9%, CursorBench v3.2: 73.4%, Humanity's Last Exam: 65.0%, GDPval-AA: 61.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 55.8%. Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.1 and Magistral Medium?

Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Magistral Medium supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5.1 and Magistral Medium?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.7 vs 13.1), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 and Magistral Medium?

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.