The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M1 40K

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 20.5.

Anthropic · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 20.5, ranking #2 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5.1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.7 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniMax M1 40K

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
MiniMax M1 40K
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.7
#2
20.5
#194
Reasoning
52.8
#5
20.7
#183
Coding
35.5
#27
8.1
#183
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Fable 5.1
MiniMax M1 40K
Tool use
30.2#18
12.9#100
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 16 for MiniMax M1 40K

1 shared

Claude Fable 5.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while MiniMax M1 40K is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Fable 5.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 40K does not.

Claude Fable 5.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Fable 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M1 40K

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Fable 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M1 40K uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Fable 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M1 40K

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16.

Claude Fable 5.1 is 15 months newer than MiniMax M1 40K.

Claude Fable 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.2yr newer
MiniMax M1 40K

Jun 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and MiniMax M1 40K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.1
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M1 40K
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M1 40K.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M1 40K?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 20.5. Claude Fable 5.1 is made by Anthropic and MiniMax M1 40K is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5.1 compare to MiniMax M1 40K in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores OSWorld 2.0: 77.9%, CursorBench v3.2: 73.4%, Humanity's Last Exam: 65.0%, GDPval-AA: 61.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 55.8%. MiniMax M1 40K scores MATH-500: 96.0%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, MMLU-Pro: 80.6%, ZebraLogic: 80.1%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 76.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.1 and MiniMax M1 40K?

Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M1 40K supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5.1 and MiniMax M1 40K?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.7 vs 20.5), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 and MiniMax M1 40K?

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and MiniMax M1 40K is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons