Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M1 40K
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 20.5.
InclusionAI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 20.5, ranking #44 overall.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose MiniMax M1 40K
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 16 for MiniMax M1 40K
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MiniMax M1 40Kdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiniMax M1 40K has 332.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 267.7% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 15 months newer than MiniMax M1 40K.
Sep 3, 2026
2 weeks ago
1.2yr newerJun 16, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MiniMax M1 40K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M1 40K.