Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M1 80K
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 21.4. MiniMax M1 80K is 20.8x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.7 to 21.4, ranking #2 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5.1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiniMax M1 80K is roughly 20.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Fable 5.1
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.7 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose MiniMax M1 80K
- cost matters — it's about 20.8x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 16 for MiniMax M1 80K
Claude Fable 5.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while MiniMax M1 80K is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 18.2x more expensive than MiniMax M1 80K ($0.55/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 22.7x more expensive than MiniMax M1 80K ($2.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Fable 5.1 is more expensive than MiniMax M1 80K.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiniMax M1 80K is limited to 40,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Fable 5.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 80K does not.
Claude Fable 5.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Fable 5.1
MiniMax M1 80K
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Fable 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M1 80K uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16.
Claude Fable 5.1 is 15 months newer than MiniMax M1 80K.
Sep 1, 2026
2 weeks ago
1.2yr newerJun 16, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Fable 5.1 is available from Anthropic. MiniMax M1 80K is available from Novita.
Claude Fable 5.1
MiniMax M1 80K
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and MiniMax M1 80K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M1 80K.