Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M1 80K
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 21.4. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 10.7x cheaper per token.
InclusionAI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 21.4, ranking #44 overall.
On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 10.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiniMax M1 80K also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 10.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose MiniMax M1 80K
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 16 for MiniMax M1 80K
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MiniMax M1 80Kdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 9.2x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($0.55/1M tokens).
For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 12.2x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($2.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiniMax M1 80K is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiniMax M1 80K has 332.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 267.7% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiniMax M1 80K accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while MiniMax M1 80K is limited to 40,000 tokens.
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 15 months newer than MiniMax M1 80K.
Sep 3, 2026
2 weeks ago
1.2yr newerJun 16, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. MiniMax M1 80K is available from Novita.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
MiniMax M1 80K
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MiniMax M1 80K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M1 80K.