The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.6

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Grok 4.6 is 6.7x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1), while Grok 4.6 is better at 1 benchmark (FrontierCode). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

On price, Grok 4.6 is roughly 6.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Fable 5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose Grok 4.6

  • cost matters — it's about 6.7x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
Grok 4.6
xAI
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
$10.00 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
500,000
Released
Jun 2026
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1), while Grok 4.6 is better at 1 benchmark (FrontierCode).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok 4.6 costs less

For input processing, Claude Fable 5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Grok 4.6 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Fable 5 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Grok 4.6 ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Fable 5 is more expensive than Grok 4.6.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
xAI
Grok 4.6
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Fable 5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Grok 4.6's 500,000 tokens. Only Claude Fable 5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok 4.6
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.6 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Fable 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5 was released on 2026-06-09, while Grok 4.6 was released on 2026-08-12.

Grok 4.6 is 2 months newer than Claude Fable 5.

Claude Fable 5

Jun 9, 2026

2 months ago

Grok 4.6

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.6 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while Claude Fable 5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.6's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Fable 5's cutoff date.

Claude Fable 5

—

Grok 4.6

Feb 2026

Provider Availability

Claude Fable 5 is available from Anthropic. Grok 4.6 is available from xAI.

Claude Fable 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Grok 4.6

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.6 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.6
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.6.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.6?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Claude Fable 5 is made by Anthropic and Grok 4.6 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Fable 5 compare to Grok 4.6 in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 95.0%, FrontierSWE: 90.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 85.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, SWE-Bench Pro: 80.0%. Grok 4.6 scores CursorBench v3.2: 69.9%, DeepSWE 1.1: 65.9%, FrontierCode: 61.3%, AA-Index: 61.0%, GDPval-AA: 58.4%.

Is Claude Fable 5 cheaper than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. Grok 4.6 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.6?

Claude Fable 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok 4.6 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.6?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 500K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $2.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.6?

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic and Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons