Model Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2-ProWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Pro is 13.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro — which is better?

Claude Fable 5 (by Anthropic) and MiMo-V2-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2-Pro is roughly 13.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Claude Fable 5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro if…

  • cost matters — it's about 13.3x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude Fable 5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Fable 5 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Fable 5 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Fable 5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Fable 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.

Claude Fable 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Fable 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Fable 5

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5 was released on 2026-06-09, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

Claude Fable 5 is 3 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.

Claude Fable 5

Jun 9, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer
MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Fable 5 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Claude Fable 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GDPval-AA score (60.5% vs 47.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (95.0% vs 78.0%)
Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5 and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Fable 5 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Fable 5 compare to MiMo-V2-Pro in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 95.0%, FrontierSWE: 90.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 85.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, SWE-Bench Pro: 80.0%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.

Is Claude Fable 5 cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5 and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Claude Fable 5 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5 and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Key differences include input pricing ($10.00 vs $1.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5 and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons