Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Pro is 6.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (DeepSearchQA, GDPval-AA, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Telecom, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

MiMo-V2-Pro is 1 month newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

1 months ago

MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher DeepSearchQA score (91.3% vs 86.7%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (53.5% vs 47.5%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (77.8% vs 71.7%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 78.0%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (99.3% vs 96.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (65.4% vs 57.1%)
Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.
MiMo-V2-Pro is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($5.00 vs $1.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.