Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-ProWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Pro is 6.7x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro — which is better?
Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and MiMo-V2-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Telecom, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, MiMo-V2-Pro is roughly 6.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
Choose MiMo-V2-Pro if…
- cost matters — it's about 6.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Telecom, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2-Pro accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.
Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Opus 4.5
MiMo-V2-Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.
MiMo-V2-Pro is 4 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.
Nov 24, 2025
7 months ago
Mar 18, 2026
3 months ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date.
Mar 2025
—
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.
Claude Opus 4.5
MiMo-V2-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
MiMo-V2-Pro
View detailsXiaomi
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro.