Model Comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.5-ProWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 36.8x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro — which is better?
Claude Fable 5 (by Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (Finance Agent v2, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is roughly 36.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Fable 5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026
Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…
- cost matters — it's about 36.8x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (Finance Agent v2, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Fable 5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 23.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Fable 5 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 57.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Fable 5 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Fable 5's 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Fable 5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Fable 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.
Claude Fable 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Fable 5
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Fable 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Fable 5 was released on 2026-06-09, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.
Claude Fable 5 is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Jun 9, 2026
1 months ago
1mo newerApr 27, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Fable 5 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.
Claude Fable 5
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Fable 5
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.