Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-ProWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 18.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.6 (by Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 2.0). Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is roughly 18.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…

  • cost matters — it's about 18.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jun 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 11.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 28.7x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jun 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Jun 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 3 months newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

4 months ago

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GDPval-AA score (53.5% vs 52.7%)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 66.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 34.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 78.9%)
Xiaomi
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (68.4% vs 65.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to MiMo-V2.5-Pro in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, Tau2 Retail: 91.9%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 11.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.43/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons