The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.3 to 16.7.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.3 to 16.7, ranking #18 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.3 and ranks #18 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.3
#18
16.7
#234
Reasoning
47.4
#26
17.0
#227
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 3 for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 21 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

0 days ago

1.7yr newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Claude Haiku 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (2024-08-01).

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.3 to 16.7. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.3 vs 16.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google.

Related comparisons