The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Kimi K2.8 Preview

Comparing Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Preview across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Preview trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Kimi K2.8 Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Kimi K2.8 Preview

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 0 for Kimi K2.8 Preview

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2.8 Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 5.5's 1,000,000 tokens. Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Kimi K2.8 Preview was released on 2026-09-11.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 1 month newer than Kimi K2.8 Preview.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

2 weeks ago

3w newer
Kimi K2.8 Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

Kimi K2.8 Preview

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Kimi K2.8 Preview is available from Moonshot AI.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Kimi K2.8 Preview

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Kimi K2.8 Preview.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K2.8 Preview (Moonshot AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Kimi K2.8 Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K2.8 Preview supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.8 Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Kimi K2.8 Preview is developed by Moonshot AI.