The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 45.2. Claude Haiku 5.5 is 9.4x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 45.2, ranking #19 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Haiku 5.5 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Claude Haiku 5.5 is roughly 9.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 9.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.0
#19
45.2
#38
Reasoning
47.2
#27
45.8
#32
Coding
40.2
#13
35.0
#30
Agents
33.3
#28
28.4
#50
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.10 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Qwen3.7 Max
Math
25.7#110
42.9#3
Vision
30.4#33
25.3#53
Tool use
20.3#59
26.3#29
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

2 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 12.5x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 7.5x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Claude Haiku 5.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Claude Haiku 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 5 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

4 days ago

4mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

Qwen3.7 Max

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra, Together.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 45.2. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 45.2), input pricing ($0.10 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons