Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
Claude Mythos 5.1 and Laguna S 2.1 are closely matched at 45.3 and 40.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Laguna S 2.1 is 160.0x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Poolside · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Mythos 5.1 and Laguna S 2.1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.3 and 40.6.
On price, Laguna S 2.1 is roughly 160.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Laguna S 2.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Mythos 5.1
- your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Laguna S 2.1
- cost matters — it's about 160.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
1 reported for Claude Mythos 5.1 · 6 for Laguna S 2.1
Claude Mythos 5.1 and Laguna S 2.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than Laguna S 2.1 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 250.0x more expensive than Laguna S 2.1 ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.1 is more expensive than Laguna S 2.1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Laguna S 2.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Mythos 5.1's 1,000,000 tokens. Only Claude Mythos 5.1 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Mythos 5.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Laguna S 2.1 does not.
Claude Mythos 5.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Mythos 5.1
Laguna S 2.1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Mythos 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Laguna S 2.1 uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Mythos 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Laguna S 2.1 was released on 2026-07-21.
Claude Mythos 5.1 is 1 month newer than Laguna S 2.1.
Sep 1, 2026
3 weeks ago
1mo newerJul 21, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Mythos 5.1 is available from Anthropic. Laguna S 2.1 is available from Poolside.
Claude Mythos 5.1
Laguna S 2.1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.1 and Laguna S 2.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Laguna S 2.1.