The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched at 40.6 and 45.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Laguna S 2.1 is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Poolside · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.6 and 45.6.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Laguna S 2.1 is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Laguna S 2.1

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Laguna S 2.1
Poolside
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.6
#57
45.6
#29
Reasoning
40.2
#55
42.5
#45
Coding
30.8
#51
36.7
#21
Agents
24.2
#56
33.1
#26
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Laguna S 2.1
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tool use
14.8#92
24.7#29
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Laguna S 2.1 · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

2 shared

Laguna S 2.1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Laguna S 2.1 costs less

For input processing, Laguna S 2.1 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, Laguna S 2.1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is more expensive than Laguna S 2.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Poolside
Laguna S 2.1
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerPoolside
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

191.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 191.0B more parameters than Laguna S 2.1, making it 161.9% larger.

Poolside
Laguna S 2.1
118.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
118.0B
Laguna S 2.1
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens.

Poolside
Laguna S 2.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Laguna S 2.1 does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Laguna S 2.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Laguna S 2.1 is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Laguna S 2.1

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Laguna S 2.1 was released on 2026-07-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2 months newer than Laguna S 2.1.

Laguna S 2.1

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Laguna S 2.1 is available from Poolside. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Laguna S 2.1

poolside logo
Poolside
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Laguna S 2.1
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Laguna S 2.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.6 and 45.6. Laguna S 2.1 is made by Poolside and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Laguna S 2.1 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Laguna S 2.1 scores SWE-bench Multilingual: 78.5%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 70.2%, SWE-Bench Pro: 59.4%, Toolathlon: 49.7%, SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA: 46.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is Laguna S 2.1 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Laguna S 2.1 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via poolside. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Laguna S 2.1 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.6 vs 45.6), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.14/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Laguna S 2.1 is developed by Poolside and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons