The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Claude Mythos 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 23.5.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 23.5, ranking #33 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.2 and ranks #33 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.2
#33
23.5
#177
Reasoning
44.2
#35
24.7
#156
Agents
34.9
#23
12.9
#100
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Claude Mythos 5.1 · 47 for Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Mythos 5.1 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Mythos 5.1 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Mythos 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Claude Mythos 5.1 is 11 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

2 weeks ago

11mo newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Claude Mythos 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 23.5. Claude Mythos 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.1 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.1 scores Terminal-Bench 4.0: 60.9%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.2 vs 23.5), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Claude Mythos 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons