The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Inkling

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 36.4. Inkling is 9.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Thinking Machines Lab · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 36.4, ranking #2 overall.

On price, Inkling is roughly 9.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Mythos 5.2 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Inkling

  • cost matters — it's about 9.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
36.4
#100
Reasoning
53.3
#8
35.9
#101
Coding
45.1
#5
26.0
#92
Agents
44.6
#2
19.0
#94
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
$0.95 / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
$4.05 / M
Context window
1,000,000
524,288

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Mythos 5.2
Inkling
Vision
31.5#33
15.5#114
Tool use
38.0#1
16.3#107
Multimodal
31.7#29
18.5#98
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 16 for Inkling

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and Inklingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Inkling costs less

For input processing, Claude Mythos 5.2 ($8.00/1M tokens) is 8.4x more expensive than Inkling ($0.95/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Mythos 5.2 ($40.00/1M tokens) is 9.9x more expensive than Inkling ($4.05/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.2 is more expensive than Inkling.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input tokens$8.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerAnthropic
Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling
Input tokens$0.95
Output tokens$4.05
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Mythos 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Inkling's 524,288 tokens. Inkling can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Claude Mythos 5.2 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling
Input524,288 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Mythos 5.2 and Inkling support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Inkling

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Mythos 5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Inkling uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Inkling

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Inkling was released on 2026-07-21.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 4 months newer than Inkling.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

0 days ago

3mo newer
Inkling

Jul 21, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Inkling's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Mythos 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Inkling's cutoff date.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

Inkling

—

Provider Availability

Claude Mythos 5.2 is available from Anthropic. Inkling is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Mythos 5.2

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $8.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

Inkling

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.05/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and Inkling side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
Inkling
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Inkling.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or Inkling?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 36.4. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and Inkling is made by Thinking Machines Lab. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to Inkling in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. Inkling scores AIME 2026: 97.1%, VoiceBench Avg: 91.4%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.7%, IFBench: 79.8%, CharXiv-R: 78.1%.

Is Claude Mythos 5.2 cheaper than Inkling?

Inkling is 8.4x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Mythos 5.2 costs $8.00/M input and $40.00/M output via anthropic. Inkling costs $0.95/M input and $4.05/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and Inkling?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Inkling supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and Inkling?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs 36.4), context window (1.0M vs 524K), input pricing ($8.00 vs $0.95/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and Inkling?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines Lab.

Related comparisons