The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Cyber vs Inkling

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 36.4. Inkling is 23.2x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Thinking Machines Lab · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 36.4, ranking #79 overall.

On price, Inkling is roughly 23.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.0 and ranks #79 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Inkling

  • cost matters — it's about 23.2x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
41.0
#79
36.4
#100
Coding
33.5
#46
26.0
#92
Agents
31.2
#47
19.0
#94
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
$0.95 / M
Output price
$100.00 / M
$4.05 / M
Context window
1,050,000
524,288

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 16 for Inkling

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Cyber and Inklingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Inkling costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens) is 21.1x more expensive than Inkling ($0.95/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens) is 24.7x more expensive than Inkling ($4.05/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Inkling.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling
Input tokens$0.95
Output tokens$4.05
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Inkling's 524,288 tokens. Inkling can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling
Input524,288 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Cyber and Inkling support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Inkling

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6 Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Inkling uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Inkling

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while Inkling was released on 2026-07-21.

GPT-6 Cyber is 4 months newer than Inkling.

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

4 days ago

3mo newer
Inkling

Jul 21, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI. Inkling is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M

Inkling

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.05/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and Inkling side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Cyber
✓ Preferred
Inkling
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs Inkling.

Which is better, GPT-6 Cyber or Inkling?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 36.4. GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI and Inkling is made by Thinking Machines Lab. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Cyber compare to Inkling in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%. Inkling scores AIME 2026: 97.1%, VoiceBench Avg: 91.4%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.7%, IFBench: 79.8%, CharXiv-R: 78.1%.

Is GPT-6 Cyber cheaper than Inkling?

Inkling is 21.1x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai. Inkling costs $0.95/M input and $4.05/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Cyber and Inkling?

GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens and Inkling supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Cyber and Inkling?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (41.0 vs 36.4), context window (1.1M vs 524K), input pricing ($20.00 vs $0.95/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Cyber and Inkling?

GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI and Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines Lab.

Related comparisons