The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Muse Wonder

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 49.2.

Anthropic · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 49.2, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Muse Wonder

  • you are already invested in the Meta ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
49.2
#25
Reasoning
53.6
#7
37.0
#96
Coding
44.6
#5
38.0
#18
Agents
44.1
#2
37.1
#17
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Mythos 5.2
Muse Wonder
Vision
31.2#36
24.4#71
Tool use
38.5#1
19.2#88
Multimodal
31.1#35
24.0#73
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 1 month newer than Muse Wonder.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

4w newer
Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Mythos 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

Muse Wonder

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or Muse Wonder?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 49.2. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Wonder?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs 49.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Wonder?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons