The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Muse Wonder

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Muse Wonder are closely matched at 52.3 and 49.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Baidu · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Muse Wonder are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 52.3 and 49.2.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Muse Wonder

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
52.3
#13
49.2
#25
50.7
#12
37.0
#96
37.9
#20
38.0
#18
38.5
#11
37.1
#17
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Muse Wonder
32.2#8
19.2#88
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 16 for Muse Wonder

1 shared

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Wonder is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).

Muse Wonder significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Muse Wonder can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 1 month newer than Muse Wonder.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

1mo newer
Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Muse Wonder?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Muse Wonder are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 52.3 and 49.2. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Muse Wonder?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 49.2), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Muse Wonder?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.