The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos Preview vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched at 54.5 and 51.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 54.5 and 51.1.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.1 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos Preview

  • you want predictable pricing at $25.00/M input and $125.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos Preview
Anthropic
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
54.5
#4
51.1
#14
Reasoning
55.3
#4
47.7
#25
Coding
44.1
#6
39.2
#17
Agents
36.6
#16
38.3
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$25.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$125.00 / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Claude Mythos Preview · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

1 shared

Claude Mythos Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ling 3.1 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (CyberGym).

Ling 3.1 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Mythos Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Claude Mythos Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Mythos Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Claude Mythos Preview's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Ling 3.1 Flash's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Claude Mythos Preview's release date.

Claude Mythos Preview

—

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos Preview
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos Preview vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Claude Mythos Preview or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 54.5 and 51.1. Claude Mythos Preview is made by Anthropic and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos Preview compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos Preview scores CyBench: 100.0%, USAMO25: 97.6%, GPQA: 94.6%, SWE-Bench Verified: 93.9%, CharXiv-R: 93.2%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.5 vs 51.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Claude Mythos Preview is developed by Anthropic and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons