The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched at 43.6 and 51.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Fireworks AI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.6 and 51.1.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ember-1
Fireworks AI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.6
#46
51.1
#14
Reasoning
38.6
#70
47.7
#25
Coding
38.0
#20
39.2
#17
Agents
31.2
#35
38.3
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ember-1
Ling 3.1 Flash
Tool use
15.9#93
29.0#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2220.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2220.0B more parameters than Ling 3.1 Flash, making it 396.4% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than Ember-1.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.6 and 51.1. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.6 vs 51.1), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons