Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5 Comparison

Comparing Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while GLM-5 is better at 1 benchmark (MCP Atlas).

Claude Opus 4.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 7.8x more expensive than GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than GLM-5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. GLM-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11.

GLM-5 is 3 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

3 months ago

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while GLM-5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

GLM-5

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. GLM-5 is available from ZAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.9% vs 77.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (59.3% vs 56.2%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher MCP Atlas score (67.8% vs 62.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Zhipu AI
GLM-5