Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is 5.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3.7 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (LiveBench, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MCP Atlas, Terminal-Bench 2.0). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3.7 Max is roughly 5.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.7 Max also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output

Choose Qwen3.7 Max if…

  • cost matters — it's about 5.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (LiveBench, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MCP Atlas, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.7 Max accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Max can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Qwen3.7 Max is 6 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

7 months ago

Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

1 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

Qwen3.7 Max

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher LiveBench score (76.0% vs 74.3%)
Higher MMMLU score (90.8% vs 90.3%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.9% vs 80.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (92.4% vs 87.0%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (76.4% vs 62.3%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (69.7% vs 59.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($5.00 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons