The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 43.6.

Anthropic · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 43.6, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7

  • you want predictable pricing at $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.6
#47
52.1
#13
Reasoning
45.2
#35
38.4
#71
Coding
35.2
#29
41.5
#8
Agents
30.1
#40
38.5
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Opus 4.7
Muse Wonder Full
Vision
32.8#23
31.7#28
Multimodal
31.4#29
31.8#25
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Claude Opus 4.7 · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Wonder Fulldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.7 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.7 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.7 was released on 2026-04-16, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 6 months newer than Claude Opus 4.7.

Claude Opus 4.7

Apr 16, 2026

5 months ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

0 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.7
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 43.6. Claude Opus 4.7 is made by Anthropic and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 4.7 compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores GPQA: 94.2%, MMMLU: 91.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 87.6%, BrowseComp: 79.3%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Wonder Full?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder Full supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.6 vs 52.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Wonder Full?

Claude Opus 4.7 is developed by Anthropic and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons