The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.8 to -5.2.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.8 to -5.2, ranking #1 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 5.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.8 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.8
#1
-5.2
#360
Reasoning
57.9
#1
-5.9
#355
Coding
51.8
#1
-0.1
#245
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Math
42.5#5
-1.3#303
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 28 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

1 shared

Claude Opus 5.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Global-MMLU), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Claude Opus 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (2024-06-01).

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

2 yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.8 to -5.2. Claude Opus 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.8 vs -5.2), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google.

Related comparisons