The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to -5.2.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.8 to -5.2, ranking #19 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.8 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.2
#359
49.8
#19
Reasoning
-5.9
#354
45.2
#30
Coding
-0.1
#244
41.8
#9
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.43 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.87 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview · 18 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1018.1B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 1018.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 53303.1% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to -5.2. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.2 vs 49.8), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons