Model Comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is 5.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max — which is better?

Claude Opus 5 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3.7 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3.7 Max is roughly 5.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Claude Opus 5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3.7 Max if…

  • cost matters — it's about 5.3x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Opus 5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 5 is more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Claude Opus 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Claude Opus 5 is 2 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Claude Opus 5

Jul 24, 2026

1 days ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together.

Claude Opus 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GDPval-AA score (62.0% vs 43.6%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (64.7% vs 41.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 5 compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5 scores BrowseComp: 90.8%, BioMysteryBench: 90.1%, OSWorld 2.0: 70.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, Humanity's Last Exam: 64.7%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Claude Opus 5 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Opus 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include input pricing ($5.00 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Opus 5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons